top of page

Capstone Rabbit Hole

When you're genuinely interested in a topic, most facets of the argument or exploration may be intriguing. As my bibliography grows and I continually add more in-depth facts to the paper, I find myself questioning, "Who is my audience?"

Who is going to read this paper? Attorneys? Students? HR professionals? It's important that it not be so detailed that it bores those in a non-HR field, yet not so over-simplified that HR experts or attorneys think it's terribly elementary.

I'm gradually solving this riddle by selecting citations that do a very good job at explaining what I don't want to spend 1-2 pages on. In a white paper, the citations support direct quotations, but it's okay to also think of citations as a hyperlink to another world of information, such as you would find in a magazine article or this blog.

That got my brain going down a rabbit hole...with the increasing digitalization of law review articles, will we eventually be able to hyperlink informational sources in real-time? Not only for the purpose of citations, but for creating avenues for further exploration and more in-depth learning. It would be lovely to create electronic paths to information, rather than make the reader refer to an old-school bibliography in order to access the source. Do you think law review articles will ever evolve to function more like an interactive blog?

Spiral silhouette image courtesy of:

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

During my research for my paper on marijuana testing in the workplace, I came upon this article, written in The Washington Post titled "Smoking weed after work? A growing number of employers don’t min

That may depend! Chances are good that the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act of 1974 has an impact on us all! Private sector plans ineligible for exemption are subject to the mandated standar

bottom of page